B2B growth

A better website brief is a set of buyer decisions.

A website brief that lists pages describes the size of a site, not what it has to do. Start instead with the decisions a buyer needs to make: whether the offer fits, what evidence supports it and how to proceed. The sitemap, the layout and the components should follow from those answers.

Replace the page list with a question map.

A sitemap is useful once you know what information belongs on the site. Before that, write the questions a visitor needs answered: what the business does, whether the offer fits, what evidence supports it and how to proceed.

Group those questions by the decision they support. That becomes a stronger basis for the sitemap than copying the navigation of a competitor. The Ayruz website was rebuilt this way: around the three situations its buyers arrive in, not its list of services.

Define the job of each page.

For a service page, the job may be to explain the problem and the delivery scope. For a case study, it may be to demonstrate how a similar problem was handled. For procurement, it may be to remove uncertainty about working arrangements.

These pages should not automatically share the same sequence. A consistent brand can accommodate different arguments and different lengths.

Write before arranging.

Review the content for clarity, specificity and evidence before fitting it into a layout. Otherwise a convenient component can quietly determine the argument: three cards become three benefits, even when the offer has a different structure.

Once the copy is complete, identify passages that need comparison, explanation or a visual sequence. Build those representations around the actual content.

Protect the content through implementation.

Compare the rendered page with the reviewed copy. Check that headings, qualifications, tables and next steps survived the build. A design review can miss a sentence that was dropped because it did not fit the component.